Home > adverts writing, adwords, adwords bot, ctr, new sites, quality score > AdWords Quality Score Basics

AdWords Quality Score Basics

February 24th, 2009

In my opinion quality score is a real pain, however it’s not necessarily a bad thing once you understand it. The main reason is that it’s not completely obvious to trick - so most people won’t manage to trick it - they’ll lose money and quit. That means that whoever manages to understand it will make much more profit than if it was simple and with a lot of competitors.

The first thing to understand is that there are several quality score phases:

Phase 1: The AdBot visits your site, and assigns you a quality score based on:


Phase 2: Actual performance on your advert (CTR)

Let’s start with Phase 1:

What you need to do is:

  • Ensure that you have a decent server and the page doesn’t take forever to load (this could be more of an issue with pages that are generated on the fly rather than a slow server by itself - even if I never had any issues with this and I was never penalized by Google because of this even when my pages were dynamic and took a few seconds to load)
  • Use the exact keyword you are bidding for twice in your advert, once on line 1 (The title) and once either on line 2 or 3 (the 2 description lines)
  • If you do this and you bid the right amount - read: http://www.ppchacking.com/2009/02/dont-be-a-miser-with-adwords-or-at-least-dont-show-it/ - then the initial quality score you’ll get will be about the content of your site - something we’ll see on the next post

In the next post we’ll see the more advanced things related to site content and also Phase 2.

Giotto De Filippi adverts writing, adwords, adwords bot, ctr, new sites, quality score

  1. May 15th, 2009 at 08:59 | #1

    Good basic stuff… but please put this phrase “bidding for twice in your advert” in a more precise way bcoz for starters it would be rather confusing…

  1. March 6th, 2009 at 06:25 | #1
  2. April 25th, 2009 at 01:42 | #2
  3. June 28th, 2009 at 03:43 | #3
  4. June 28th, 2009 at 03:43 | #4